Supreme Court ruled baker had his religion demeaned in court The Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple, is asking an appeals court to overturn a lawsuit brought by a person who identifies as transgender.
Jack Phillips was a “professional baker and a devout Christian,” according to a 2018 Supreme Court ruling that the commission violated his constitutional rights to freedom of religion and speech by a vote of 7 to 2. In 2012, Phillips said he would not sell wedding cakes to same-sex couples, but would sell other baked goods.The couple filed a discrimination lawsuit against Phillip with the CCRC.
Both the commission and the Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that Phillip’s actions violated the state’s antidiscrimination laws.
The case received national attention and went to the country’s Supreme Court for six years.
2017 – The date the Supreme Court agreed to the hearing – Autumn Skardina called Phillips’ Masterpiece Cake Shop and asked them to make a birthday cake that was blue on the outside and pink on the inside in honor of Skardina’s gender transition. A Denver-based attorney, Skaldina was born male but identifies as female.
Phillips declined on religious grounds. According to the Denver Post, he testified at trial that he doesn’t believe anyone can change their gender and doesn’t bless “those who think they can.”
Scarina filed a complaint against Phillips and later sued. CCRC said what the baker hadDenied equal enjoyment of public space.
“This customer came to us on purpose to either get us to make a cake or refuse to make a cake that goes against our religious beliefs,” Phillips said. fox news of litigation. “This customer has been following our case for years.
of League of Libertya Christian advocacy and legal group representing Philips, said: Scardina’s phone calls “looked like a hoax,” so the lawyers then demanded a cake to celebrate the devil.
The organization also said the baker had previously “sent messages that insulted LGBT people, expressed racism, celebrated Halloween, promoted the use of marijuana, praised or supported Satan, among other things, including his own.” I refused to make a cake containing various messages that go against my faith.”
“We simply want the law to be enforced,” Scardina’s attorney, Paula Gracen, said. CPR 2019.
ADF sued Colorado on behalf of Phillips, claiming the state wrongfully targeted him. In 2019, a district court judge denied the state’s motion to dismiss the case. The CCRC dismissed his charges against Phillips in March 2019, noting new evidence proving that Colorado acted hostilely to the baker because of his religion.
In 2021, Judge A. Bruce Jones said Phillips’ constitutional rights were not violated by enforcing Colorado’s antidiscrimination laws.
“Anti-discrimination laws ensure that members of our society who have historically been mistreated and deprived of even their daily right to access businesses to purchase their products are no longer treated as ‘others’. It is intended to be Blues“This lawsuit concerns one such product, namely a pink and blue birthday cake, and is not to be compelled to speak.”
he ordered Phillips making cakes.
October 5, ADF Lawyer Jake Warner went to the Court of Appeals, arguing that forcing Phillips to make the cake tantamount to violating First Amendment rights and making him say things he didn’t believe. He sought to overturn Jones’ judgment.
Next
